Blog Post

The First Principles of Taking Responsibility for Your Health

Tom Kortenbach • Aug 01, 2020

It is one of the paradoxes of the twenty-first century. Approximately, 11 percent of the people on earth are undernourished(UN, 2020), and 13 percent of the world population is suffering from obesity, often even in the same country(WHO, 2020b). How is this problem growing and what are possible solutions to shrink it? The following article will examine the issue of nutrition and health, and attempt to uncover the obstacles, before reasoning to a possible solution for the issue at hand. In order to demarcate the area, this article will focus on the metropolitan area in the Netherlands called the Randstad. The area consists of the four largest cities of the country - Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht - and all the smaller cities in between. This diverse region makes it quite representative for many urban areas in the world and will hopefully offer solutions that can be used elsewhere.

Introduction to the problem

The WHO even has classified the issue of obesity as an epidemic in 2017. Where in the past obesity was a ‘first world problem’, nowadays, the increase of overweight and obese people is 30% quicker in developing countries than in developed countries(WHO, 2020a). In a post created by the World Bank, they argued that “as countries develop, diets diversify into more nutritious foods (though sometimes slowly ), but they also diversify into unhealthy foods like soft drinks”(Headey & Alderman, 2019). One of the prevalent causes of this issue is because of the unequal distribution of commodities and wealth(WHO, 2020b); however, the issue of obesity also arises from an underlying problem: People do not take responsibility for their health by means of their nutrition, in the Randstad. All over the world, obesity is becoming a bigger problem by increasing the cases of noncommunicable diseases, such as diabetes, heart diseases, strokes and cancer(WHO, 2020c). Solving this issue cannot only assist in the eradication of hunger because of a better distribution of the existing nutrition, but also in the improvement of people’s health in general.

The ideal objective is that people take responsibility for their health by solely consuming nutrition that is beneficial to their health, for which we will use ‘an apricot’ as an example. For unhealthy nutrition, we will use ‘the muffin’ as an example. For readability purposes this article will not follow the first principles thinking steps to the letter. It will combine the identification of both the assumptions and first principles, which are derived from an obstacle, in one section. This way it will be less mechanical and easier for you to follow along to the solutions!

Obstacles that are blocking our objective

As first principles thinking dictates, in order to find promising solutions for this issue and to achieve the objective, we first have to uncover the obstacles that are in the way of our objective. When examining the issue, a few obstacles come to mind.

Unawareness

The first (1) obstacle I see is that perhaps people do not know what nutrition is (un)healthy for them. In the Netherlands, lessons about nutrition and the effects are not explicitly taught in primary or secondary school, aside from biology lessons(WUR, 2016). Moreover, the Netherlands, and especially the metropolitan area of the Randstad, is very multicultural(CBS, 2019). This means that if people do not depend on schools but their parents for information about nutrition, then there are many different perspectives and starting points to teach about nutrition and its health effects.

Cost effectiveness

The second (2) obstacle I see is that unhealthy nutrition is often cheaper than healthy nutrition, especially when you are not preparing it yourself. An example here is that a hamburger costs €1,- at a well-known fast-food chain, but a side salad is €1,95(Snack Nieuws, 2016). People do not only make a decision based on the nutritional value but also on the monetary value of the product, especially when they are not well off and need to make conscious decisions on what they spend their money on.

Time efficiency

Lastly (3), it is easier to prepare unhealthy nutrition compared to healthy nutrition. Often, unhealthy nutrition is easy to prepare because you only have to, for example, reheat it. However, this does not necessarily make it unhealthy because of the cooking method but because of the salts and sugars that are added to make it taste better.

With such a complex issue, there are likely to be many more obstacles in place, especially depending on the location that you are looking into the issue. However, for this article, the focus will be on the obstacles mentioned above. This will also help in following the line of reasoning.

Assumptions and first principles

These three obstacles lead me to take a look at my assumptions. Personally, I think the first obstacle - people do not know what nutrition is (un)healthy for them - has two different assumptions. The first one is that people are not interested in their health. The second assumption is that people think that nutrition has no effect on their health, which is, in my opinion, a classic case of the Dunning-Kruger effect (when people think they are more knowledgeable on a subject than they truly are, and act accordingly)(Kruger & Dunning, 2000).

The first principle we can derive from the assumptions might be a bit obvious, but I think necessary to mention: people are not taught enough about the effects of nutrition on their health, in primary and secondary school. This first principle is for both the first and the second assumption because when people learn more about a subject, they often realize how much they do not know. We could dig deeper to why this is not in the school’s curricula, but for this exercise we will leave it here because it displays a good enough first principle to work with.

For the second obstacle - unhealthy nutrition is often cheaper than healthy nutrition – there are a few assumptions at hand. The first assumption I think is the obstacle itself. Is unhealthy nutrition really cheaper compared to healthy nutrition, or is it relatively cheaper? For example, one hamburger is as expensive as one or two pieces of vegetables, but do they both leave you as satisfied? Another example is that the actual costs of the nutrition might not be so high, but the taxes on the products are. Depending on the product, this way healthy nutrition can become more expensive than unhealthy nutrition.

Often, the cost of labor with healthy nutrition (the apricot) is higher, compared to unhealthy nutrition (the muffin). Often unhealthy nutrition has additional ingredients to enhance the flavor or smell, such as sugar, salt and fats(WHO, 2018). This way the unhealthy nutrition is much easier to make in larger quantities because these added ingredients disguise the fact that the actual substance is not that great. With healthy nutrition, usually, they are hardly processed ingredients that take much time to cultivate, for example, a farmer growing its apples. A first principle we can take from these assumptions is that unhealthy nutrition is cheaper to make because of the possibility to make it in larger quantities with less labor.

The last obstacle - it is easier to prepare unhealthy nutrition compared to healthy nutrition – ties back into the previous obstacles [1] a bit. To me, it is a big assumption that unhealthy nutrition is easier to prepare than healthy nutrition. It is more likely that people simply do not know how to prepare food, which makes it easier to heat some unhealthy nutrition in the microwave or even order it to be delivered (as a majority of the take-out food is quite unhealthy). What is one of the key ingredients to cook your own food? Besides possessing some basic knowledge about cooking, most important is that they need time to do it. Especially the latter is something that people nowadays have a shortage of and/or are unwilling to spend on their nutrition as they are rushed with work, a social life, children and other duties. This causes people to take out more, and use prepared food that only has to be heated.

If we would go a bit deeper, we could wonder why people think it is less important to prepare yourself a healthy and nutritious meal, than for example to have a bigger social life or work more? In the West and especially in the Randstad, people are very focused on pursuing a career as quickly as possible and have very many friends, as the way of thinking is that then you are successful (and maybe even that then you will be happy). Moreover, because it is the most densely populated area of the Netherlands, there is ample possibility to take out different types of food (even some healthy ones). Lastly, housing is more expensive in the big cities, which often makes the kitchen very small and impractical. This all makes it less likely that people want to spend much time on cooking and more likely that they order or take-out food.

Conclusions from the analysis and possible solutions

So, what can we conclude from these obstacles and first principles that we have discovered and how can we work towards a solution? Here we make a division between what the government can do or what private people can do. For the government, the first solution to me would be that in the schools there should be a more structural focus in children’s education on the benefits of nutrition on health. By doing this, people would learn more about the topic, and gain more skills in order to cook their own food. Additionally, people would become more aware of the risks related to unhealthy eating habits, such as heart and vascular diseases.

Another major improvement would be that unhealthy nutrition is moneywise simply not the easiest option. This can be done by taxing for example nutrition with high sugar or fat quantities. The other way around, unprocessed healthy nutrition can be taxed less, which would make it cheaper compared to unhealthy nutrition. When people need to make a decision in their budget for what type of food they will buy, healthy nutrition should be the sensible option.

What people themselves living in the Randstad, or society at large, can do is being made aware that they do not necessarily need to choose between having a career and a good social life, and eating proper nutritious food. One solution would be if they buy healthier food when they do take out, another would be that they start cooking for friends because cooking is the best for other people, so it matches greatly with having a good social life!

References

CBS. (2019, August 30). Bevolking; geslacht, leeftijd en nationaliteit op 1 januari . Retrieved July 26, 2020, from CBS: ttps://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/03743/table?fromstatweb

Headey, D., & Alderman, H. (2019, July 23). The high price of healthy food … and the low price of unhealthy food . Retrieved July 26, 2020, from World Bank: https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/high-price-healthy-food-and-low-price-unhealthy-food

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (2000, January). Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1121-1134. Retrieved from Kruger and Dunning's 1999 study, "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments"

Snack Nieuws. (2016, November 25). Dit is de complete prijslijst van McDonald’s . Retrieved July 26, 2020, from Snack Nieuws: https://www.snack-nieuws.nl/dit-is-de-complete-prijslijst-van-mcdonalds-2016/

UN. (2020, July 26). SDG 2 . Retrieved from Sustainable Development: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg2

WHO. (2018, June 1). Noncommunicable diseases . Retrieved from World Health Organisation: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases

WHO. (2020, July 26). Obesity and Overweight . Retrieved from World Health Organisation: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight

WHO. (2020a, July 26). Obesity . Retrieved from World Health Organisation: https://www.who.int/health-topics/obesity#tab=tab_1

WHO. (2020b, July 26). Obesity . Retrieved from World Health Organisation: https://www.who.int/health-topics/obesity#tab=tab_2

WUR. (2016, March 7). Voedingseducatie onmisbaar in het onderwijs . Retrieved July 26, 2020, from Wageningen University & Research: https://www.wur.nl/nl/nieuws/Voedingseducatie-onmisbaar-in-het-onderwijs.htm

Apply first principles thinking yourself?

Would you like to apply first principles thinking yourself and have your problem-solving experience published in the First Principles Thinking Review? Then be sure to check out the submission guidelines and send us your rough idea or topic proposal. Our editorial team would be happy to work with you to turn that idea into an article. 

Submission guidelines

Share this page

Disclaimer : The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in submissions published by FIPS reflect those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views held by FIPS, the FIPS team or the authors' employer.


Copyrights : You are more than welcome to share this article. If you want to use this material, for example when writing an article of your own, keep in mind that we use cc license BY-NC-SA. Learn more about the cc license here .

What's new?

Using First Principles Thinking to Solve Our Hiring Heroes Problem in the United States
By Eric A. Wright, PhD 15 Dec, 2023
The challenge of reintegrating a nation-state’s military veteran back into its civilian workforce has persisted since the time of Caesar Augustus in Rome circa 13 BC. Therefore, it is time to innovate on this millennia-old communications problem and solve it, at least in the US, and First Principles Thinking is a time-tested problem-solving technique. The first step in applying the power of first principles thinking is to break the veteran hiring problem down into its seven fundamental elements, what Aristotle called first principles, to accurately define it. Then we can use five applicable philosophical razors to separate, i.e., shave off, our extant assumptions from the identified first principles to clear our clouded current thinking. Doing so then allows us to reassemble the first principles in a new way, creating an innovative solution to veteran hiring through first principles thinking, which we can implement, at least in the United States, using nine proven tools and techniques.
By Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions 23 Aug, 2022
The Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions is proud to present you with the second volume of the First Principles Thinking Review. In the spring of 2020, we launched this publication with the aim of creating a space to host an international and interdisciplinary conversation about tackling societal challenges with first principles thinking. Over the past several months, a number of returning and first-time authors from different backgrounds and walks of life have contributed their thought-provoking ideas to the Review. In the following pages, you will learn about the role of first principles in the scientific method and how they shape the process from coming up with possible explanations, or hypotheses, to generating theories. Furthermore, you will see how first principles thinking can be applied to a wide array of challenges, from fighting homelessness to evaluating business opportunities. Finally, you will be granted an exclusive preview of state-of-the-art research being conducted on FPT.
By Kacper Grass 13 Aug, 2022
This review article provides a brief summary and analysis of First Principles by Thomas E. Ricks, in which the author explores how classical philosophy and first principles thinking influenced the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. The review also highlights how the author’s own political thinking draws on first principles and concludes by summarizing some of the strengths and shortcomings of his recent work.
By Alexander Verkerk, Kacper Grass & Tom Kortenbach 09 Jan, 2022
This article presents the first principles thinking process as a collaborative effort undertaken by three problem-solvers from the Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions. In response to the challenge of improving living conditions in the Jan Luykenlaan neighbourhood of The Hague in the Netherlands, the team demonstrates how individually generated ideas can be synthesised in order to produce original approaches to achieving a common goal.
By Cate Griffiths 12 Dec, 2021
Does the language we use to talk about peace prevent peace? Defining peace in terms of conflict and violence seems to restrict peace-related activities to matters requiring negotiation, conflict resolution and violence prevention, and to evoke delimited emotional responses. I sense that new ideas about peace could only come from a systematic, first principles approach to a topic that is accepted as a social good but rarely examined this way. Perhaps such an exercise would strip back the concept to reveal the root experiences, behaviors and emotions we point to when we say, ‘this is peace’. I hope that by identifying the first principles of peace it might generate creative ideas to enable a new perception of peace, beyond the absence of violence, and that could be used to effectively promote peace.
By Zhennan Low 09 Oct, 2021
Upon becoming an independent city-state in 1965, Singapore had to overcome the challenges of nation-building in a small but culturally and ethnically diverse territory. In his search for solutions, Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), the country’s founding father, employed first principles thinking as a societal problem-solving technique. By identifying three first principles at the root of his challenge, LKY was able to overcome the obstacles of nation-building and lay the foundations for a cohesive and prosperous society in Singapore.
Unsplash - Using First Principles Thinking in Marketing How I Generated Media Attention to Help Feed
By Klint Ciriaco 02 Aug, 2021
In this article, I expand on my experiences of using first principles thinking in the field of marketing (Ciriaco, 2020). I begin by comparing first principles thinking to reasoning by analogy before providing an outline of the method’s fundamental steps. I then share a personal case study that illustrates how first principles thinking helped me find a way to get a nonprofit organization TV coverage with zero budget. The article concludes with a discussion of when it is and is not most advantageous to use first principles thinking in your work.
First Principles Thinking Review (Volume 2 / Issue 1) by the Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions
By Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions 30 Jun, 2021
The Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions is proud to present you with the second volume of the First Principles Thinking Review. In the spring of 2020, we launched this publication with the aim of creating a space to host an international and interdisciplinary conversation about tackling societal challenges with first principles thinking. Over the past several months, a number of returning and first-time authors from different backgrounds and walks of life have contributed their thought-provoking ideas to the Review. In the following pages, you will learn about the role of first principles in the scientific method and how they shape the process from coming up with possible explanations, or hypotheses, to generating theories. Furthermore, you will see how first principles thinking can be applied to a wide array of challenges, from fighting homelessness to evaluating business opportunities. Finally, you will be granted an exclusive preview of state-of-the-art research being conducted on first principles thin
First Principles Thinking Innovation Kmar Hachicha Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions
By Kmar Hachicha and the FIPS Team 20 Jun, 2021
In the following interview, Kmar Hachicha, a graduate student from the Technical University of Brunswick, offers the FIPS Team and its readers a unique insight into her novel research on first principles thinking as an innovation process. In the conversation that follows, she tells us about her thesis project, what she discovered as well as her experiences working with first principles thinking.
Giza Pyramid, first principles thinking, Factory for Innovative Policy Solutions
By Alexander Verkerk 16 Jun, 2021
First principles thinking can be used for several purposes, ranging from coming up with innovative solutions to contextualising your research and making decisions. The potential of this technique is far reaching, but several of its applications are underexposed. This article provides you with practical insights on another way in which the technique can be helpful: generating potential explanations (hypotheses). The example of finding out how the pyramids of Giza were built is used for illustration purposes and may not always be underpinned by fully accurate assumptions.
Show More
Share by: